Unknown Chinese Model 1

image


For someone like me that loves Chinese women, suddenly discovering all of these Chinese models on websites like MetCN and more is nothing short of outstanding. The only problem is that the Chinese do it differently. These are not "adult websites" the same way they are in the United States. These are "body art" websites that use nude models. As a result, the model is considered less important, and is often not named in the gallery in favor of more abstract titles such as "Away From the Noise."


Because of this, sometimes I will find a model I find beautiful, and have absolutely no way of finding out who the model is. It won't be anywhere on the website, and the gallery itself may be exclusive to the site as well (meaning that I won't find the same photos on another site, so I cannot find the model name elsewhere).

Still, I want to feature them, so I'm going to have to occasionally throw in a model I do not recognize with no name and only one gallery. I don't think you all mind, but I have done my best to get the names of all of these women and I'm a little annoyed that I can't find out who they are. Oh well.

Photos:

image


image


image


image


image


Link:

Gallery


Posted by: TravisStroup on Sep 02, 09 | 6:14 am | Profile

COMMENTS


It also means that I might accidentally feature the same model twice, not recognizing her from another set of photos. Luckily I don't foresee that happening.


Posted by: TravisStroup on Sep 02, 09 | 6:28 am

Beautiful photos! I really like the Chinese art stuff - it's real art, as opposed to porn like most "art nude" site these days with their endless pussy close-ups (e.g. Met "Art").

Still, I use the term "photo" with some trepidation, as these are clearly Photoshop collages. It is quite obvious that the model is superimposed on the background, especially in the third pic.


Posted by: Dr. Lee on Sep 02, 09 | 7:21 am

Indeed - I was thinking the same thing. Though I did not notice the photoshopping at first glance, I will say that the Chinese appear to be outstanding at turning attractive women into stunning women in their photos. I have no doubt that these women are quite pretty in real life, but with the added benefits of this type of phenomenal photo editing, these images are some of the best I've seen, and I can't seem to stop looking at them. Her skin looks flawless - but even better, it looks naturally flawless, as though it was not edited at all. It's really quite good stuff, and I'm glad that I found them so that I can keep featuring them on here.


Posted by: TravisStroup on Sep 02, 09 | 7:32 am

You're right Doc...that third pic is *horrible* (from a Photoshop standpoint). That said, the last shot on the stairs I find gorgeous. :)


Posted by: AS_Appreciation on Sep 02, 09 | 8:43 am

stunning, both the art and the model...
about #3, it's harsh strobe lighting that creates the shadow edge, not bad Ptshp skills

Thanks Travis!
can't wait for more true finds like that...


Posted by: sucez on Sep 02, 09 | 9:44 am

Absolutely stunning!! Thanks Travis!


Posted by: Sefu on Sep 02, 09 | 11:44 am

I disagree on the photoshopping. I dont think they are collages but even if they are, I like em. She is lovely.


Posted by: redlaw on Sep 02, 09 | 1:55 pm

Take another look at the third pic in particular - the shadow behind the model is completely unnatural. They're certainly collages, but I like 'em too - a lot!

I thought you were supposed to be an expert on photography. ;-)


Posted by: Dr. Lee on Sep 02, 09 | 3:10 pm

A very classic beauty. She looks almost angelic in nature to say the least.


Posted by: Spartan on Sep 02, 09 | 4:03 pm

I am no expert on anything. I try not to irritate you anymore, Dr. Lee. It is hard to see from these images but I agree the shadow is quite distinct. Definitely some post processing going on but I cant determine if it is an overlay. I will click through the galleries and see it in Hi res. Mostly to look at her beautiful skin but I will check out the light edges too.


Posted by: redlaw on Sep 02, 09 | 4:10 pm

Another give away is that the model is much more in focus (front to back) than the pole immediately behind her (some of which would have been in the same focal plane as parts of her body if it were a real photo). Her hair in particular looks very obviously cut out, and much sharper than the pole it is supposed to be pressed against. You really can't see this?

Oh yes - her skin is entirely artificial too, although as Travis says, very well done. I can see now why you don't appreciate realism in photography. ;-)


Posted by: Dr. Lee on Sep 02, 09 | 4:51 pm

Wow, doc. I guess you hold a grudge. I havent made a comment on photography in almost 2 years. I see what you are saying. I didnt examine them and the galleries are not super hires like other met-art ones i've seen. I will defer to your expertise on these matters.


Posted by: redlaw on Sep 02, 09 | 5:12 pm

Sorry redlaw, just teasing. :-) And there's a reason these photos not super high res (to their credit, Met Art's photos have quite minimal post processing).


Posted by: Dr. Lee on Sep 02, 09 | 5:27 pm

I've enjoyed the commentary on photoshop techniques since it's a subject I know practically nothing about.

One thing I noticed a lot in both China and Taiwan is the number of women who actually had flawless skin. Even women well into middle age had fabulous skin that was almost like a baby, though they had aged in their face.

I would think there'd be models that needed little to no touch up in that regard though in the world of photography, that might not be possible. I realize some do it more than others, but are all model photos edited to create such artificial effects?

Regardless of how they were created, these are wonderful photos. Thanks, Travis!


Posted by: Hakka Guy on Sep 02, 09 | 6:32 pm

Travis, you're in rare form. All great posts since I last visited a week ago. Another lovely find.


Posted by: slackerking on Sep 02, 09 | 8:50 pm

Outstanding find, Travis. This woman has a very transcendent beauty, IMO.

If she has been featured here before, she is worth a second look, to be sure. I hope someone knows who she is.

As for the discussion of photoshopping, my initial response is, "who cares?". But to add my 2 cents, I have seen photos I was certain were photoshopped (much more obvious than these), but discovered they were not.


Posted by: Bigfoot Dean on Sep 02, 09 | 11:25 pm

Beautiful, petite, natural, with a toned tummy. No problem if it's photoshop, let me believe she exists. :)


Posted by: daznlover on Sep 03, 09 | 2:17 am

Super, and I love those concaved nipples. I bet when she gets hot they spring out.


Posted by: johnnie on Sep 03, 09 | 3:11 am

Concave? They look very convex to me. :-)


Posted by: Dr. Lee on Sep 03, 09 | 3:21 am

STANDBY ALL 'DELETE' STATIONS..the TROUBLEMAKER IS BACK: GEEZE...you (so-called) photo experts quibble over photographic details! Are we talking about 'female beauty' or 'photographic skill' at A-S???
This Chinese model is...photoshop or no...an IDEAL of the 'female form'!! Can't it just be THAT??


Posted by: NIGHTHAWK on Sep 03, 09 | 4:49 am

@Hakka G, et.al.: I know not of Taiwan ladies...I do know...the women of Cheng du, Sichuan (my beautiful spouse being one) TREASURE their fair skin...allowed by the cloudy and humid climate there. She becomes VERY upset when the sun darkens her complexion. Such a CONTRAST with the 'idealized' suntanned western beauties!!


Posted by: NIGHTHAWK on Sep 03, 09 | 5:16 am

Holy frak! (that's right, I said 'frak') Words don't describe her.


Posted by: Elric on Sep 03, 09 | 5:33 am

concave, convex, sue me.


Posted by: johnnie on Sep 03, 09 | 5:42 am

I think the third and fourth photo show her natural complexion.


Posted by: johnnie on Sep 03, 09 | 5:43 am

omg so hot. everything from a beautiful face all that way down to long sexy toes!


Posted by: ..... on Sep 03, 09 | 6:09 am

Ever the contrarian, I like the 3rd pic and I like flaws.


Posted by: Asian Panty Lover on Sep 03, 09 | 8:05 am

Well done Travis, great find and such beauty.


Posted by: Mzungu on Sep 03, 09 | 3:08 pm

She just looks so yum to me.


Posted by: arf on Sep 03, 09 | 7:54 pm

@ Nighthawk: There's an expression in China that talks about different areas, for instance, go to Beijing to learn about politics, go to Guangzhou to learn about food, go to Shanghai to learn about business, etc. but the last one is to go to Chengdu to find a wife. :-)


Posted by: Hakka Guy on Sep 03, 09 | 8:06 pm

Hakka, so where should I go, to find this beautiful model? That's all I care now. :)


Posted by: daznlover on Sep 03, 09 | 10:20 pm

Shanghai is a good place to find beautiful models. A lot of the famous catwalk models use Shanghai as their base. They are really really tall!!!!


Posted by: eezee23 on Sep 03, 09 | 11:02 pm

Beautiful model. The retouching on the first photo is superb. The third photo has disastrous lighting which the retoucher tried to accommodate but failed.


Posted by: johninbkk on Sep 04, 09 | 2:57 am

I bet that those nipples pop right out at the right time just like Kitty Yung.


Posted by: johnnie on Sep 04, 09 | 3:43 am

As I said, they already look well and truly "popped out" to me. :-)


Posted by: Dr. Lee on Sep 04, 09 | 5:21 am

Wow, no one complained about her small breasts!! You'd think they would have photoshopped in some bigger ones:-) Truly, truly lovely.


Posted by: Wingsfan19 on Sep 04, 09 | 10:45 am

@ daznlover: I agree with eezee23; the best looking women are in Shanghai and the best looking women in Shanghai are usually from Zhejiang province, at least for my taste. Check it out in the summer when many of the girls wear those short short denim shorts... best legs in the world!

@ Wingsfan19: I think no one's complained about her small breasts because they fit her figure and they're well shaped. Reminds me of the old expression, "More than a mouthful is wasteful". :-)


Posted by: Hakka Guy on Sep 04, 09 | 5:24 pm

Perhaps in China, breast implant is not common. She is preety eventhough with small breasts.


Posted by: Niners on Sep 05, 09 | 9:55 pm

Just checked photo 3 and I'm happy to report that this is clearly NOT a photoshopped photo.

View and enlarge the original picture, don't let anyone's amateur eyes fool you, and notice the shadows and her long hair peeking out from her back up close.

The abrupt shadows are easily the result of the lighting setup.


Posted by: TedS on Sep 06, 09 | 3:44 am

From the same site, I think this asian girl is hotter and with nicer breasts, but I don't think she's even chinese.

http://www.91rtys.com/html/hwrtys/579.html

http://wvw.91rtys.com/wprt/215/1.jpg


Posted by: TedS on Sep 06, 09 | 3:47 am

Ted, those photos posted are of You Xuan, who has her own post just a few places before this. Also, you clearly have something against Chinese women, and all of these women look exactly like their nationalities. Why you think otherwise is beyond me.


Posted by: TravisStroup on Sep 06, 09 | 8:50 am

TedS makes me sleepy with his newguyisms. I was like him once, but I got over it.


Posted by: arf on Sep 06, 09 | 10:42 am

TedS - you've just destroyed whatever remote sliver of credibility you may have had (not that your earlier comments garnered much). Besides what I've already described, the combination of the shadow under her right arm and above her left arm - without any shadow under her left armpit - is physically impossible. I think you also need to see a few more Chinese women before posting any more comments about what their actual ethnicity is, or who is hotter than whom.


Posted by: Dr. Lee on Sep 06, 09 | 2:31 pm

Hakka Guy: I think her perky breasts are cute, it's just usually we have several here who complain about small-breasted women.


Posted by: Wingsfan19 on Sep 07, 09 | 10:50 am

wow, she looks like an angel without wings.. ;)


Posted by: Hot-Models on Sep 17, 09 | 7:49 am

Nice. Love the nipples.


Posted by: knarf on Sep 18, 09 | 1:21 am

Average boobs.....but uber hot nips!!!! :D :D


Posted by: bigwhisker on Sep 19, 09 | 2:37 am

Need more of her


Posted by: PlayerMP2 on Sep 24, 09 | 9:56 am